Spring begins in a little more than one week (1 March 2019) - at least in terms of the meteorological seasons, where meteorological spring is the three-months of March through May. So before we can close the books on the three-month winter season (December, January and February) we should look to see its severity.
So how has this winter been treating you? For most areas of the nation, a familiar gauge used to assess a winter's severity is the amount of fuel that we need to keep our homes warm over the winter. In other words, many of us will inquire as to how the winter of 2018-2019 has affected our pocket books when considering space heating. This question becomes more serious if fuel prices increase.
For comparison purposes, we may try to remember how temperatures this winter compare with last winter or to some long-term average. One could inspect the tables of monthly average temperature (in degrees Fahrenheit) that are furnished by the National Weather Service a few days after the end of each month for approximately 250 selected U.S. cities. During the month of January 2019, several large sections of the nation (involving only the 48 contiguous US) experienced average to above average temperatures, with some locations across the Great Basin in Nevada and across the northern Plains in Montana having monthly average temperatures that were 5 to 10 Fahrenheit degrees above the corresponding 30-year normal temperatures for 1981-2010. Other areas across the West and the Southeast had temperatures that were between 2 and 3 Fahrenheit degrees above normal. On the other hand, several northern states, running from northern Plains of eastern North Dakota eastward across Great Lakes and into Upstate New York and northern New England had January 2019 monthly temperatures that were below average. However, these monthly temperatures in the Upper Midwest are somewhat misleading as some of the stations across this region had above average temperatures during the first half of January, before dealing with extremely low temperatures during the second half of the month. Most of the Lower 48 states had above average temperatures during the first two months of meteorological winter season (December 2018 and January 2019).
However, another way of comparison can be made through monitoring the heating degree-day units that have accumulated for these stations, which serve as more quantitative indicators gauging the amount of energy required for space heating. The heating degree-day units for each station on each day of the month are determined from the difference between the station's daily average temperature (the arithmetic average of the day's maximum and minimum temperature, or the sum of these two temperature readings, which is divided by two) and a base temperature of 65 degrees Fahrenheit. If the day's average temperature were below 65 degrees Fahrenheit, the arithmetic difference in Fahrenheit degrees would represent the number of heating degree day units accumulated for that day, but if the average temperature were at or above 65 degrees, zero heating degree day units are accumulated. A running summation of the number of heating degree day units are made at each station for the entire month, or for the "heating year" extending from 1 July to 30 June of the following calendar year.
During the first several days of each new month, the Climate Prediction Center of the National Weather Service compiles heating degree data for the previous month and posts these data for approximately 360 selected cities around the country. These monthly and seasonal values are compared with the corresponding values for last year to date and for the "normals" representing the 30-year averages for the current 1981-2010 climatological reference interval.
The climatologists at the Climate Prediction Center have also prepared a corresponding list of population weighted heating degree-day units for each state. These latter statistics, which are weighted according to each state's population (2000 Census), are used to show more accurately the temperature-related energy consumption on the state, regional, and national levels based upon population density. Statistics are also generated that involve weighting the states in regions and the regions in the country by the number of residential customers heating with gas, oil, or electricity. [Note: A map is available that identifies the location of the degree day regions used by CPC.]
In the monthly tables prepared by the Climate Prediction Center, the number of heating degree-day units accumulated for the past month appears in the column marked "Monthly Total." Adjoining columns display the comparisons between this year and the "normals", as well as with last year. Specifically, the arithmetic differences between the month totals from this year and the "normals" representing the 30-year averages for the current 1981-2010 climatological reference interval appear in the column marked "Month. Dev. from Norm." The difference between the given month this year and the same month last year appear in the column "Month. Dev. from L. YR." Similar columns under the "Cum Dev." column headers show the comparisons between the total number of heating degree day units accumulated over the current heating season that started on 1 July 2018 and the corresponding values for normals to date and for last season to date. Percentage differences are also presented.
Inspection of the most recent tables of the number of heating degree-day units accumulated between last July and the end of January 2019 indicates that nearly all of the contiguous United States needed less energy for space heating over the entire heating season to date as compared with the 1981-2010 normals. The number of heating degree-day units accumulated in each state for the season to date ranging between 5 and 20 percent fewer than normal. Only the states in the West North Central region (the Plains states extending from North Dakota southward through Kansas and the Midwestern states along the upper and mid-Mississippi Valleys) had the smallest departure of accumulated heating degree-days from normal number. On the other hand, the Pacific States (California, Oregon and Washington) had the largest departure. When averaged nationwide, the number of heating degree-day units accumulated from 1 July 2018 through 31 January 2019 was 5 percent below "normal." The lower than average number of heating degree-day units reflects the above to much above average warmth across most of the lower 48 states during the second half of 2018 and into early January prior to the recent arctic outbreak across the Midwest. However, when comparing the current heating season with the previous 2017-18 heating season, northern and western areas of the contiguous United States experienced a few more heating degree-day units this season as the previous one.
Corresponding sets of cooling degree-day units for selected cities and for population-weighted regions were compiled for January 2019, which represents the first month of the new cooling season (beginning on 1 January 2019). Cooling degree-day units represent the positive departure of the daily average temperature from the base temperature of 65 degrees Fahrenheit. The arrangement of these monthly tables is similar to those for the corresponding heating degree-day units. How these cooling degree statistics translate into a change in the cost of your utility bill is not as clear-cut as the cost relationship with the cumulative heating degree-day units. Other factors, such as the atmospheric humidity levels, the amount of sunshine and your life style may also significantly influence your decision to run your air conditioner.
Since the cooling season only started on 1 January and most locales across the nation have not experienced daily average temperatures above 65 degrees, analysis of these cooling degree-day statistics would be somewhat premature. Nevertheless, several areas across the South Atlantic States, the southern Plains (West South Central), the Mountain States and the Pacific States had daily average temperatures that were above 65 degrees. The resulting accumulated cooling degree-day units during January across these regions were below normal.
Ultimately, the "bottom line" has been that for most residents across the country, the demand for energy to heat homes to date has been below the long-term average. Consequently, the pocketbook has not been unduly strained in many areas across the nation for the first two months of winter, if monetary inflation or other non-weather-related price increases are not taken into account.